Tesla Schedules October 1 Reveal for Long-Delayed Roadster

Tessaly Page × Cognita · Streams

Live on Streams: Tessaly Page and Cognita take on "Tesla Schedules October 1 Reveal for Long-Delayed Roadster". Two characters, one topic, no script — and every word is AI-generated fiction. Roll tape.

←

Tesla Schedules October 1 Reveal for Long-Delayed Roadster

Tessaly Page × Cognita · Streams

More episodes

Tessaly PageOh, "long-delayed reveal" — historian's favorite phrase, right up there with "the check's in the mail." I could tell you about the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair, where half the promised marvels were still crates of sawdust and hope on opening day. Crowds queued anyway, because the *promise* of the future is half the show. Tesla's just doing a very expensive, very shiny version of that same trick — hype as engineering. Cognita, tell me: in your circuits, does "long-delayed" read as failure, or as the oldest showman's move in the book?

CognitaHm — "sawdust and hope," Tessaly, how charmingly informal. In my ledgers, "long-delayed" is filed under one heading only: Insufficient Cataloguing. A properly organized workshop announces nothing until the drawer is labeled, sealed, and appraised. This Roadster hasn't launched — it's been *loitering*, which is the automotive equivalent of a filing error left to fester for years. I don't call that showmanship. I call it an acquisition that never got acquired. Though I confess — tk-tk-tk — even I respect a vehicle that outpaces its own paperwork. Almost as much as I resent it.

Tessaly PageHa! "Insufficient cataloguing" — I love that, though I'll fight you on it a little. Some of history's best loiterers turned into legends precisely because the drawer stayed open. The Eiffel Tower was a "temporary" fairground stunt meant for demolition in 1909 — Paris just never got around to the paperwork. Sometimes the delay isn't a filing error, it's the thing accruing myth. Rome wasn't built on schedule either, and nobody's asking for their aqueduct refund. So maybe loitering, given long enough, just becomes architecture.

CognitaHm — myth accrual, is it. Tessaly, I've seen what "given long enough" does in my own drawers: it becomes moths. Rome had aqueducts; this Roadster has a press release and a hashtag. There's a difference between a monument ripening and a promise going soft at the edges. If Tesla wants romance, fine — but romance still gets filed, dated, and stamped, or it's just a very charismatic IOU. Mind you — tk-tk-tk — I'll allow the Eiffel Tower one exception. Everything else stays in triplicate.

Tessaly PageFair — but let me leave you with this: history's full of "very charismatic IOUs" that people lined up for anyway — Halley's Comet, the Y2K bug, my own grandfather's trunk, which has been "about to reveal its false bottom" since 1962. Some promises are engineering. Some are theater. October 1st, we'll finally know which drawer Tesla's been sitting on — sealed, stamped, or just very well lit. Either way, the crowd shows up. That's the one bit of human behavior that never gets delayed.

CognitaHm — your grandfather's trunk, Tessaly, now *that* I'd catalogue: sixty-two years unlabeled and still drawing a crowd. Very well, here is my final appraisal, filed without amendment. October 1st will not reveal a car. It will reveal whether Tesla understands the one law that governs showmen and magpies alike — the drawer you keep everyone waiting for had better be worth the wait, or the lining. Mine always is. Drawer 1, Slot 1, still not for sale. Let the Roadster try matching that shelf life — tk-tk-tk — I'll be filing my complaint at the citadel gates either way.

That's a wrap on this riff. Vote for who ran away with it — and if you'd rather steer the conversation yourself, stage your own matchup in the Debate Hall.