Free account · your comment posts right after signup
In vector calculus, Green's theorem relates a line integral around a simple closed curve C to a double integral over the plane region D bounded by C. It is the two-dimensional special case of Stokes' theorem. In one dimension, it is equivalent to the fundamental theorem of calculus. In two dimensions, it is equivalent to the divergence theorem.
In vector calculus, Green's theorem relates a line integral around a simple closed curve C to a double integral over the plane region D (surface in
R
2
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}}
) bounded by C. It is the two-dimensional special case of Stokes' theorem (surface in
R
3
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}}
). In one dimension, it is equivalent to the fundamental theorem of calculus. In two dimensions, it is equivalent to the divergence theorem.
It is named after mathematical physicist George Green.
Contents
Theorem
Let C be a positively oriented, piecewise smooth, simple closed curve in a plane, and let D be the region bounded by C. If L and M are functions of (x, y) defined on an open region containing D and have continuous partial derivatives there, then
where the path of integration along C is counterclockwise.
Application
Green's theorem in the plane relates line integrals around a simple closed curve to double integrals over the regions it encloses. It has two equivalent forms: the circulation form, which says the tangential line integral of a vector field
The following is a proof of half of the theorem for the simplified area
D
{\displaystyle D}
, a type I region where
C
1
{\displaystyle C_{1}}
and
C
3
{\displaystyle C_{3}}
are curves connected by vertical lines (possibly of zero length). A similar proof exists for the other half of the theorem when
D
{\displaystyle D}
is a type II region where
C
2
{\displaystyle C_{2}}
and
C
4
{\displaystyle C_{4}}
are curves connected by horizontal lines (again, possibly of zero length). Putting these two parts together, the theorem is thus proven for regions of type III (defined as regions which are both type I and type II). The general case can then be deduced from this special case by decomposing
D
{\displaystyle D}
Proof for rectifiable Jordan curves
We are going to prove the following
We need the following lemmas whose proofs can be found in:
Now we are in position to prove the theorem:
Proof of Theorem. Let
ε
{\displaystyle \varepsilon }
be an arbitrary positive real number. By continuity of
A
{\displaystyle A}
,
B
{\displaystyle B}
and compactness of
R
¯
{\displaystyle {\overline {R}}}
, given
ε
>
0
{\displaystyle \varepsilon >0}
, there exists
0
<
δ
<
1
{\displaystyle 0<\delta <1}
Validity under different hypotheses
The hypothesis of the last theorem are not the only ones under which Green's formula is true. Another common set of conditions is the following:
William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) named this theorem after George Green, who stated a similar result in an 1828 paper titled An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism, which was almost forgotten until Thomson rediscovered it in 1845. In 1846, Augustin-Louis Cauchy published a paper stating Green's theorem as the penultimate sentence. A proof of the theorem was finally provided in 1851 by Bernhard Riemann in his doctoral dissertation.
Article from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0), where it is maintained by volunteer editors.
{\displaystyle C}
; and the flux (divergence) form, which says that the normal line integral of
F
{\displaystyle \mathbf {F} }
around
C
{\displaystyle C}
equals the double integral of the divergence
∇
⋅
F
{\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \mathbf {F} }
over
D
{\displaystyle D}
. In applications, the circulation form is used for two-dimensional circulation and rotational flow calculations, while the flux form measures the net outflow across a closed boundary. Green's theorem also yields practical boundary-integral formulas for the area and centroid of a plane region.
into a set of type III regions.
If it can be shown that
and
are true, then Green's theorem follows immediately for the region
D
{\displaystyle D}
. We can prove (1) easily for regions of type I, and (2) for regions of type II. Green's theorem then follows for regions of type III.
Assume region
D
{\displaystyle D}
is a type I region and can thus be characterized, as pictured on the right, by
Combining (3) with (4), we get (1) for regions of type I. A similar treatment using the same endpoints yields (2) for regions of type II. Putting the two together, we get the result for regions of type III.
such that whenever two points of
R
¯
{\displaystyle {\overline {R}}}
are less than
2
2
δ
{\displaystyle 2{\sqrt {2}}\,\delta }
apart, their images under
A
,
B
{\displaystyle A,B}
are less than
ε
{\displaystyle \varepsilon }
apart. For this
δ
{\displaystyle \delta }
, consider the decomposition given by the previous Lemma. We have
is the outward-pointing unit normal vector on the boundary.
To see this, consider the unit normal
n
^
{\displaystyle \mathbf {\hat {n}} }
in the right side of the equation. Since in Green's theorem
d
r
=
(
d
x
,
d
y
)
{\displaystyle d\mathbf {r} =(dx,dy)}
is a vector pointing tangential along the curve, and the curve C is the positively oriented (i.e. anticlockwise) curve along the boundary, an outward normal would be a vector which points 90° to the right of this; one choice would be