Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack said monetary policy is not restrictive enough to bring down persistently high inflation and argued that it is time for the Federal Reserve to act. She cited recent economic data and conversations with businesses, including a Northeast Ohio manufacturer reporting double-digit increases in input costs. Hammack was one of three policymakers who dissented from the Fed’s July decision to leave interest rates unchanged. Following a stronger-than-expected jobs report, markets were assigning slightly better-than-even odds to a rate increase at the Fed’s September 15–16 meeting, while expectations for near-term rate cuts have weakened.
Where do you stand?
How it spread
What each side asserts, disputes — or leaves out entirely.
Whose framing of this story rings truest to you?
Center· 3 sources
“Hammack: Fed policy not restrictive enough”Right
Free account · your comment posts right after signup
Markets pricing in 60% odds after one dissent seems like an overreaction. Let's see the actual jobs and CPI numbers first.
Local input prices are one data point, national trends are another. Curious how she reconciles the two.
Hammack's been consistent on this, but a hike now feels like it'd hit borrowers just as things were stabilizing.