U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman ruled on Sept. 22, 2026, that extreme heat in Texas Department of Criminal Justice prisons without air conditioning violates the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment. His 150-page order requires the agency to install air conditioning systemwide by Dec. 31, 2029, immediately develop and implement a plan, and file progress reports every six months. When the trial began, about 37% of inmates had cool beds, leaving nearly 89,000 without; as of Sept. 1, 38 of 104 units were fully cooled. The agency has estimated the cost at about $1.5 billion. Pitman wrote that witnesses described getting sick, passing out, and finding it common to splash toilet water on themselves, adding, “These are not humane conditions.” He cited indoor temperatures above 85 degrees nearly daily from May through September, heat indexes over 130, acknowledged 2023 deaths including John Castillo at a body temperature of 107.5 degrees, and called Director Bobby Lumpkin’s failure to enact a committed plan deliberate indifference. TDCJ said it will appeal. Amanda Hernandez said the agency has robust heat mitigation and denies deliberate indifference. Advocates called the ruling a major victory; lawmakers and budget choices remain ahead.
Where do you stand?
How it spread
What each side asserts, disputes — or leaves out entirely.
Whose framing of this story rings truest to you?
Right· 0 sources
No right coverage yet — a bubble gap.
Why should it be a pleasure to be in a prison?
People lived without A/C before it was introduced. Why should taxpayers pay for the comfort of criminals? What luxury will be mandated next?
Perhaps the judge should get to enjoy it too.
The ruling makes sense since extreme heat counts as cruel punishment, but the long timeline lets the state drag its feet.
Spending 1.5 billion on air conditioning for inmates feels like a waste when roads and schools need fixing first.
It's about time someone stepped in to fix the heat in Texas prisons before more people suffer.